Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal concerning unexplained money under s.69A, rejecting additions based on difference between agreement to sale and final sale deed values. The Tribunal upheld that registered sale deed value prevails over unregistered agreement amounts. Additions under s.69A based on loose papers were deleted as these were deemed 'dumb documents' lacking corroborative evidence. Regarding undisclosed cash receipts, ITAT found transactions were properly accounted through partner's capital account. Unexplained expenditure additions under s.69C were deleted as Revenue failed to establish alleged payments. Following precedent, Tribunal held loose sheets/diaries inadmissible as evidence for additions. ITAT emphasized registered sale deeds' sanctity over mere agreements to sale without contrary evidence.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
