Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT upheld revision proceedings u/s 263 regarding undisclosed property transactions discovered during recovery proceedings. The assessee had failed to report capital gains from three properties and subsequently acknowledged these transactions. Though initially captioned as a proposal u/s 263, the AO's information was deemed valid grounds for PCIT's intervention. The jurisdictional challenge regarding PCIT-21 versus PCIT-12's authority was rejected, as current jurisdiction lay with PCIT-12 when proceedings were initiated on 22.02.2021. The assessee's prior agreement to settle and subsequent failure to provide documentation within the stipulated timeframe further supported PCIT's findings. Appeal dismissed.
ITAT upheld revision proceedings u/s 263 regarding undisclosed property transactions discovered during recovery proceedings. The assessee had failed to report capital gains from three properties and subsequently acknowledged these transactions. Though initially captioned as a proposal u/s 263, the AO's information was deemed valid grounds for PCIT's intervention. The jurisdictional challenge regarding PCIT-21 versus PCIT-12's authority was rejected, as current jurisdiction lay with PCIT-12 when proceedings were initiated on 22.02.2021. The assessee's prior agreement to settle and subsequent failure to provide documentation within the stipulated timeframe further supported PCIT's findings. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
