<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Commissioner&#039;s Revision Powers Upheld in Section 263 Case Over Undisclosed Property Sales and Capital Gains.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85164</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld revision proceedings u/s 263 regarding undisclosed property transactions discovered during recovery proceedings. The assessee had failed to report capital gains from three properties and subsequently acknowledged these transactions. Though initially captioned as a proposal u/s 263, the AO&#039;s information was deemed valid grounds for PCIT&#039;s intervention. The jurisdictional challenge regarding PCIT-21 versus PCIT-12&#039;s authority was rejected, as current jurisdiction lay with PCIT-12 when proceedings were initiated on 22.02.2021. The assessee&#039;s prior agreement to settle and subsequent failure to provide documentation within the stipulated timeframe further supported PCIT&#039;s findings. Appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2025 08:26:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2025 08:26:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=791820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Commissioner&#039;s Revision Powers Upheld in Section 263 Case Over Undisclosed Property Sales and Capital Gains.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85164</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld revision proceedings u/s 263 regarding undisclosed property transactions discovered during recovery proceedings. The assessee had failed to report capital gains from three properties and subsequently acknowledged these transactions. Though initially captioned as a proposal u/s 263, the AO&#039;s information was deemed valid grounds for PCIT&#039;s intervention. The jurisdictional challenge regarding PCIT-21 versus PCIT-12&#039;s authority was rejected, as current jurisdiction lay with PCIT-12 when proceedings were initiated on 22.02.2021. The assessee&#039;s prior agreement to settle and subsequent failure to provide documentation within the stipulated timeframe further supported PCIT&#039;s findings. Appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2025 08:26:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>