Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The HC dismissed the appeal, holding that no substantial question of law arose from the ITAT's order. The ITAT had allowed the assessee's claim for benefits u/ss 11 and 12, and for carrying forward losses for 7 assessment years. The HC found that the appellant had merely disputed factual findings under the guise of substantial questions of law, which is impermissible. The ITAT's order was well-reasoned, without any perversity, after considering all grounds raised by the appellant.
The HC dismissed the appeal, holding that no substantial question of law arose from the ITAT's order. The ITAT had allowed the assessee's claim for benefits u/ss 11 and 12, and for carrying forward losses for 7 assessment years. The HC found that the appellant had merely disputed factual findings under the guise of substantial questions of law, which is impermissible. The ITAT's order was well-reasoned, without any perversity, after considering all grounds raised by the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
