https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85044 The HC dismissed the appeal, holding that no substantial question of law arose from the ITAT's order. The ITAT had allowed the assessee's claim for benefits u/ss 11 and 12, and for carrying forward losses for 7 assessment years. The HC found that the appellant had merely disputed factual findings under the guise of substantial questions of law, which is impermissible. The ITAT's order was well-reasoned, without any perversity, after considering all grounds raised by the appellant. en-us Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:16:26 +0530 Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:16:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85044 The HC dismissed the appeal, holding that no substantial question of law arose from the ITAT's order. The ITAT had allowed the assessee's claim for benefits u/ss 11 and 12, and for carrying forward losses for 7 assessment years. The HC found that the appellant had merely disputed factual findings under the guise of substantial questions of law, which is impermissible. The ITAT's order was well-reasoned, without any perversity, after considering all grounds raised by the appellant. Highlights Income Tax Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:16:26 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85044