Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
Appellant company contravened Section 8(1) of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 by acquiring and transferring foreign exchange of US$ 28,26,433.26 without requisite permission, and borrowing foreign exchange of US$ 3,33,025 and lb7,068.38. AT upheld findings of violation, reduced penalty on company to 25% already deposited considering case's antiquity and facts. However, AT set aside penalty on Mr. Ishaat Hussain finding no evidence of his involvement in company's affairs regarding aircraft purchase.
Appellant company contravened Section 8(1) of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 by acquiring and transferring foreign exchange of US$ 28,26,433.26 without requisite permission, and borrowing foreign exchange of US$ 3,33,025 and lb7,068.38. AT upheld findings of violation, reduced penalty on company to 25% already deposited considering case's antiquity and facts. However, AT set aside penalty on Mr. Ishaat Hussain finding no evidence of his involvement in company's affairs regarding aircraft purchase.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
