Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Appellant company contravened Section 8(1) of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 by acquiring and transferring foreign exchange of US$ 28,26,433.26 without requisite permission, and borrowing foreign exchange of US$ 3,33,025 and lb7,068.38. AT upheld findings of violation, reduced penalty on company to 25% already deposited considering case's antiquity and facts. However, AT set aside penalty on Mr. Ishaat Hussain finding no evidence of his involvement in company's affairs regarding aircraft purchase.
Appellant company contravened Section 8(1) of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 by acquiring and transferring foreign exchange of US$ 28,26,433.26 without requisite permission, and borrowing foreign exchange of US$ 3,33,025 and lb7,068.38. AT upheld findings of violation, reduced penalty on company to 25% already deposited considering case's antiquity and facts. However, AT set aside penalty on Mr. Ishaat Hussain finding no evidence of his involvement in company's affairs regarding aircraft purchase.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
