Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The appellant provided logistics services ancillary to Cargo Handling Services (CHS), not separate Business Support Services (BSS). The demand for additional service tax under BSS was set aside. The CESTAT held the appellant's services were correctly classified under CHS, not BSS. As the appellant admitted CHS liability, the extended period of limitation was incorrectly invoked. The liability was restricted to the normal period.
The appellant provided logistics services ancillary to Cargo Handling Services (CHS), not separate Business Support Services (BSS). The demand for additional service tax under BSS was set aside. The CESTAT held the appellant's services were correctly classified under CHS, not BSS. As the appellant admitted CHS liability, the extended period of limitation was incorrectly invoked. The liability was restricted to the normal period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.