Revenue authority mandates using scheme-specific reversal procedures, not revising original entries, for instrument-based trade/customs benefits effec...
Transaction value under s.15(1) governs unrelated sales; valuation between related parties per Rule 28; consignment note required for unregistered rec...
The appellant provided logistics services ancillary to Cargo...
Logistics services ancillary to Cargo Handling, not separate Business Support Services.
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Plus +
Source NTF
AI Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
https://www.taxtmi.com/hi...
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
ExpandCollapse
Service TaxJanuary 18, 2025Case LawsAT
The appellant provided logistics services ancillary to Cargo Handling Services (CHS), not separate Business Support Services (BSS). The demand for additional service tax under BSS was set aside. The CESTAT held the appellant's services were correctly classified under CHS, not BSS. As the appellant admitted CHS liability, the extended period of limitation was incorrectly invoked. The liability was restricted to the normal period.
The appellant provided logistics services ancillary to Cargo Handling Services (CHS), not separate Business Support Services (BSS). The demand for additional service tax under BSS was set aside. The CESTAT held the appellant's services were correctly classified under CHS, not BSS. As the appellant admitted CHS liability, the extended period of limitation was incorrectly invoked. The liability was restricted to the normal period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick
reference only.