Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
HC allowed the petition by remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority. The alleged violation of Section 16(4) of the CGST Act by the petitioners for not complying with input tax credit provisions would no longer exist due to the insertion of Section 16(5). The Adjudicating Authority is directed to pass a fresh de novo order considering Section 16(5), which came into operation on 01.07.2017, after verifying the facts.
HC allowed the petition by remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority. The alleged violation of Section 16(4) of the CGST Act by the petitioners for not complying with input tax credit provisions would no longer exist due to the insertion of Section 16(5). The Adjudicating Authority is directed to pass a fresh de novo order considering Section 16(5), which came into operation on 01.07.2017, after verifying the facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
