<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court remands input tax credit case for fresh order u/s 16(5.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84906</link>
    <description>HC allowed the petition by remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority. The alleged violation of Section 16(4) of the CGST Act by the petitioners for not complying with input tax credit provisions would no longer exist due to the insertion of Section 16(5). The Adjudicating Authority is directed to pass a fresh de novo order considering Section 16(5), which came into operation on 01.07.2017, after verifying the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 08:17:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 08:17:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court remands input tax credit case for fresh order u/s 16(5.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84906</link>
      <description>HC allowed the petition by remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority. The alleged violation of Section 16(4) of the CGST Act by the petitioners for not complying with input tax credit provisions would no longer exist due to the insertion of Section 16(5). The Adjudicating Authority is directed to pass a fresh de novo order considering Section 16(5), which came into operation on 01.07.2017, after verifying the facts.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 08:17:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>