Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT upheld the AO's treatment of relinquishment of rights under a compromise as transfer of a capital asset. The AO calculated capital gains based on the value of land received in lieu of relinquishing rights in litigation. The assessee failed to rebut the AO's findings that properties acquired by other entities were effectively received by the assessee pursuant to the compromise deed to quash criminal proceedings against a third party without the assessee paying anything. The ITAT rejected the assessee's argument of being a purchaser of the immovable property and decided against the assessee.
The ITAT upheld the AO's treatment of relinquishment of rights under a compromise as transfer of a capital asset. The AO calculated capital gains based on the value of land received in lieu of relinquishing rights in litigation. The assessee failed to rebut the AO's findings that properties acquired by other entities were effectively received by the assessee pursuant to the compromise deed to quash criminal proceedings against a third party without the assessee paying anything. The ITAT rejected the assessee's argument of being a purchaser of the immovable property and decided against the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.