<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Rights relinquished under compromise treated as transfer of capital asset, capital gains calculated.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84896</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the AO&#039;s treatment of relinquishment of rights under a compromise as transfer of a capital asset. The AO calculated capital gains based on the value of land received in lieu of relinquishing rights in litigation. The assessee failed to rebut the AO&#039;s findings that properties acquired by other entities were effectively received by the assessee pursuant to the compromise deed to quash criminal proceedings against a third party without the assessee paying anything. The ITAT rejected the assessee&#039;s argument of being a purchaser of the immovable property and decided against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 08:17:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 08:17:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=789339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Rights relinquished under compromise treated as transfer of capital asset, capital gains calculated.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84896</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the AO&#039;s treatment of relinquishment of rights under a compromise as transfer of a capital asset. The AO calculated capital gains based on the value of land received in lieu of relinquishing rights in litigation. The assessee failed to rebut the AO&#039;s findings that properties acquired by other entities were effectively received by the assessee pursuant to the compromise deed to quash criminal proceedings against a third party without the assessee paying anything. The ITAT rejected the assessee&#039;s argument of being a purchaser of the immovable property and decided against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 08:17:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>