Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order and notice u/s 148A(b). AO failed to establish that petitioner had received any amount exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/- which escaped assessment. AO is required to form an opinion based on credible information contradicting petitioner's assertion that aggregate transaction value was less than Rs. 50,00,000/-. Merely stating transactions existed without substantiating higher value is insufficient for reopening assessment u/s 147.
HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order and notice u/s 148A(b). AO failed to establish that petitioner had received any amount exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/- which escaped assessment. AO is required to form an opinion based on credible information contradicting petitioner's assertion that aggregate transaction value was less than Rs. 50,00,000/-. Merely stating transactions existed without substantiating higher value is insufficient for reopening assessment u/s 147.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
