Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order and notice u/s 148A(b). AO failed to establish that petitioner had received any amount exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/- which escaped assessment. AO is required to form an opinion based on credible information contradicting petitioner's assertion that aggregate transaction value was less than Rs. 50,00,000/-. Merely stating transactions existed without substantiating higher value is insufficient for reopening assessment u/s 147.
HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order and notice u/s 148A(b). AO failed to establish that petitioner had received any amount exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/- which escaped assessment. AO is required to form an opinion based on credible information contradicting petitioner's assertion that aggregate transaction value was less than Rs. 50,00,000/-. Merely stating transactions existed without substantiating higher value is insufficient for reopening assessment u/s 147.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
