Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order and notice u/s 148A(b). AO failed to establish that petitioner had received any amount exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/- which escaped assessment. AO is required to form an opinion based on credible information contradicting petitioner's assertion that aggregate transaction value was less than Rs. 50,00,000/-. Merely stating transactions existed without substantiating higher value is insufficient for reopening assessment u/s 147.
HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order and notice u/s 148A(b). AO failed to establish that petitioner had received any amount exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/- which escaped assessment. AO is required to form an opinion based on credible information contradicting petitioner's assertion that aggregate transaction value was less than Rs. 50,00,000/-. Merely stating transactions existed without substantiating higher value is insufficient for reopening assessment u/s 147.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
