Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Appellants undertook packing/repacking, labeling/re-labeling of machine parts. Issue was classification of earthmoving machines - as automobiles or not. CESTAT held amendment making parts/components/assemblies of earthmoving equipment taxable under "Automobiles" effective prospectively from 29.04.2010, not retrospectively. Earthmoving machines not "automobiles" in common parlance. Amendment to include them under "Automobiles" prospective from 29.04.2010. Impugned orders set aside. Appeal allowed.
Appellants undertook packing/repacking, labeling/re-labeling of machine parts. Issue was classification of earthmoving machines - as automobiles or not. CESTAT held amendment making parts/components/assemblies of earthmoving equipment taxable under "Automobiles" effective prospectively from 29.04.2010, not retrospectively. Earthmoving machines not "automobiles" in common parlance. Amendment to include them under "Automobiles" prospective from 29.04.2010. Impugned orders set aside. Appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.