Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
SC held that the Limitation Act applies to proceedings u/s 34 of the ACA, with specific exclusions. Section 4 applies only to the 3-month period, and Section 10 of the GCA does not apply. While the ACA prescribes different limitation periods, it does not exclude the Limitation Act's provisions unless the nature and language necessarily exclude them. The mere prescription of a different period is insufficient to displace the Limitation Act's applicability. The SC dismissed the appeal.
SC held that the Limitation Act applies to proceedings u/s 34 of the ACA, with specific exclusions. Section 4 applies only to the 3-month period, and Section 10 of the GCA does not apply. While the ACA prescribes different limitation periods, it does not exclude the Limitation Act's provisions unless the nature and language necessarily exclude them. The mere prescription of a different period is insufficient to displace the Limitation Act's applicability. The SC dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
