Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that for determining the fair market value of shares u/s 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act, it is mandatory to follow the methods prescribed u/rs 11U and 11UA. The valuation report submitted by the assessee, which used methods like future earning analysis and adjusted net asset method not allowed under the Rules, was rightly rejected by the AO. The ITAT directed the AO to delete the addition made by treating the share premium and share capital as income u/s 56(2)(viib), as the assessee had discharged its onus by submitting a valuation report as per the prescribed Rules. The decision was in favor of the assessee.
The ITAT held that for determining the fair market value of shares u/s 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act, it is mandatory to follow the methods prescribed u/rs 11U and 11UA. The valuation report submitted by the assessee, which used methods like future earning analysis and adjusted net asset method not allowed under the Rules, was rightly rejected by the AO. The ITAT directed the AO to delete the addition made by treating the share premium and share capital as income u/s 56(2)(viib), as the assessee had discharged its onus by submitting a valuation report as per the prescribed Rules. The decision was in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
