Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The ITAT held that for determining the fair market value of shares u/s 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act, it is mandatory to follow the methods prescribed u/rs 11U and 11UA. The valuation report submitted by the assessee, which used methods like future earning analysis and adjusted net asset method not allowed under the Rules, was rightly rejected by the AO. The ITAT directed the AO to delete the addition made by treating the share premium and share capital as income u/s 56(2)(viib), as the assessee had discharged its onus by submitting a valuation report as per the prescribed Rules. The decision was in favor of the assessee.
The ITAT held that for determining the fair market value of shares u/s 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act, it is mandatory to follow the methods prescribed u/rs 11U and 11UA. The valuation report submitted by the assessee, which used methods like future earning analysis and adjusted net asset method not allowed under the Rules, was rightly rejected by the AO. The ITAT directed the AO to delete the addition made by treating the share premium and share capital as income u/s 56(2)(viib), as the assessee had discharged its onus by submitting a valuation report as per the prescribed Rules. The decision was in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
