Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The HC rejected the petitioner's submissions and held: The issue of alleged cash receipt was not examined during regular assessment proceedings as the information was received after conclusion of assessment. The reopening is based on information under CBDT's Risk Management Strategy, not on the erroneous statement that no return was filed. The approval u/s 151 is not without application of mind as remarks show consideration of material and information. No reason to quash the reopening notices, but petitioner can raise objections in reassessment/appellate proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.