Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The NCLAT upheld the order of the Adjudicating Authority directing valuation of intangible assets and rejecting the appellant's revised resolution plan. The appellant's initial resolution plan was approved, but upon an application by an unsecured creditor, the Adjudicating Authority ordered revaluation of intangible assets and reconsideration by the CoC. The appellant's revised plan was rejected by the CoC, and the Adjudicating Authority rightly dismissed the appellant's application as infructuous, directing issuance of fresh Form G. The NCLAT held that the intangible assets must be valued separately, and the CoC's commercial wisdom in rejecting the revised offer was a legitimate exercise of discretion. The appeal was dismissed.
The NCLAT upheld the order of the Adjudicating Authority directing valuation of intangible assets and rejecting the appellant's revised resolution plan. The appellant's initial resolution plan was approved, but upon an application by an unsecured creditor, the Adjudicating Authority ordered revaluation of intangible assets and reconsideration by the CoC. The appellant's revised plan was rejected by the CoC, and the Adjudicating Authority rightly dismissed the appellant's application as infructuous, directing issuance of fresh Form G. The NCLAT held that the intangible assets must be valued separately, and the CoC's commercial wisdom in rejecting the revised offer was a legitimate exercise of discretion. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
