<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Corporate Debtor&#039;s Revised Resolution Plan Rejected After Intangible Asset Valuation; NCLAT Upholds CoC&#039;s Discretion.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84568</link>
    <description>The NCLAT upheld the order of the Adjudicating Authority directing valuation of intangible assets and rejecting the appellant&#039;s revised resolution plan. The appellant&#039;s initial resolution plan was approved, but upon an application by an unsecured creditor, the Adjudicating Authority ordered revaluation of intangible assets and reconsideration by the CoC. The appellant&#039;s revised plan was rejected by the CoC, and the Adjudicating Authority rightly dismissed the appellant&#039;s application as infructuous, directing issuance of fresh Form G. The NCLAT held that the intangible assets must be valued separately, and the CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom in rejecting the revised offer was a legitimate exercise of discretion. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2025 08:44:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2025 08:44:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=786437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Corporate Debtor&#039;s Revised Resolution Plan Rejected After Intangible Asset Valuation; NCLAT Upholds CoC&#039;s Discretion.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84568</link>
      <description>The NCLAT upheld the order of the Adjudicating Authority directing valuation of intangible assets and rejecting the appellant&#039;s revised resolution plan. The appellant&#039;s initial resolution plan was approved, but upon an application by an unsecured creditor, the Adjudicating Authority ordered revaluation of intangible assets and reconsideration by the CoC. The appellant&#039;s revised plan was rejected by the CoC, and the Adjudicating Authority rightly dismissed the appellant&#039;s application as infructuous, directing issuance of fresh Form G. The NCLAT held that the intangible assets must be valued separately, and the CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom in rejecting the revised offer was a legitimate exercise of discretion. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2025 08:44:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>