Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
The NCLAT held that the Respondent Bank was entitled to invoke the personal guarantee against the Appellant as the principal borrower had failed to discharge the debt. Once the principal borrower defaults, the liability of the personal guarantor gets triggered. The Bank's officer who filed the Section 95 application was duly authorized under the State Bank of India General Regulations, 1955. The appeal was dismissed.
The NCLAT held that the Respondent Bank was entitled to invoke the personal guarantee against the Appellant as the principal borrower had failed to discharge the debt. Once the principal borrower defaults, the liability of the personal guarantor gets triggered. The Bank's officer who filed the Section 95 application was duly authorized under the State Bank of India General Regulations, 1955. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.