Prospective valuation amendment limits reassessment: unamended fair market value reference could not justify reopening based on a registered valuer's ...
The HC held that although its previous order did not prescribe a specific timeline, the respondent submitted that inquiries into alleged bogus firms were ongoing, and an appropriate decision on cancellation of GST registration would be taken within a month. The petition was disposed of.
The HC held that although its previous order did not prescribe a specific timeline, the respondent submitted that inquiries into alleged bogus firms were ongoing, and an appropriate decision on cancellation of GST registration would be taken within a month. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.