TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Contempt Petition Rejected: Authorities Given Four Weeks to Complete Inquiry into Alleged Bogus Firms</h1> <h3>M/s PIHU ENTERPRISES Versus MS. CHANCHAL YADAV</h3> HC dismissed contempt petition, finding no willful disobedience. Court noted original order lacked specific timeline and respondent was conducting ... Seeking initiation of the contempt proceedings against the respondent for the wilful disobedience of the order [2024 (9) TMI 756 - DELHI HIGH COURT] - respondent was directed to consider the cancellation of the GST registration at the earliest - HELD THAT:- It appears that as such no specific timeline was prescribed in the aforesaid order. However, the respondent submits that some inquiries are going on into the alleged bogus firms and the appropriate decision would be taken within a month from today. Petition disposed off. In the case before the Delhi High Court, presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dharmesh Sharma, the petitioner sought contempt proceedings against the respondent for alleged 'wilful disobedience' of a prior court order dated 09.09.2024 in W.P.(C) No.12621/2024. This order directed the respondent to consider the cancellation of GST registration promptly. The court noted that the previous order did not specify a timeline for compliance. The respondent's counsel indicated ongoing inquiries into alleged bogus firms, promising a decision within a month. The court disposed of the petition, directing that an 'appropriate decision be taken within four weeks' and that the petitioner be informed immediately thereafter.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
