Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The appellant had a bona fide belief that services provided by foreign service providers outside India were not taxable. CESTAT held that since there was revenue neutrality due to availability of CENVAT credit, the extended period for demand could not be invoked as there was no intention to evade service tax. Relying on previous decisions, CESTAT concluded that the demand raised for the extended period was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed.
The appellant had a bona fide belief that services provided by foreign service providers outside India were not taxable. CESTAT held that since there was revenue neutrality due to availability of CENVAT credit, the extended period for demand could not be invoked as there was no intention to evade service tax. Relying on previous decisions, CESTAT concluded that the demand raised for the extended period was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
