Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The CESTAT held that goods not unloaded and exported back do not qualify as 'imported goods' under the Customs Act, 1962. The principle of unjust enrichment does not apply to such goods that were not unloaded and were exported back. The refund claim of customs duty paid on the quantity of goods not unloaded needs to be examined afresh without considering unjust enrichment. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication.
The CESTAT held that goods not unloaded and exported back do not qualify as 'imported goods' under the Customs Act, 1962. The principle of unjust enrichment does not apply to such goods that were not unloaded and were exported back. The refund claim of customs duty paid on the quantity of goods not unloaded needs to be examined afresh without considering unjust enrichment. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
