Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The CESTAT held that goods not unloaded and exported back do not qualify as 'imported goods' under the Customs Act, 1962. The principle of unjust enrichment does not apply to such goods that were not unloaded and were exported back. The refund claim of customs duty paid on the quantity of goods not unloaded needs to be examined afresh without considering unjust enrichment. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication.
The CESTAT held that goods not unloaded and exported back do not qualify as 'imported goods' under the Customs Act, 1962. The principle of unjust enrichment does not apply to such goods that were not unloaded and were exported back. The refund claim of customs duty paid on the quantity of goods not unloaded needs to be examined afresh without considering unjust enrichment. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
