Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The CESTAT held that goods not unloaded and exported back do not qualify as 'imported goods' under the Customs Act, 1962. The principle of unjust enrichment does not apply to such goods that were not unloaded and were exported back. The refund claim of customs duty paid on the quantity of goods not unloaded needs to be examined afresh without considering unjust enrichment. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication.
The CESTAT held that goods not unloaded and exported back do not qualify as 'imported goods' under the Customs Act, 1962. The principle of unjust enrichment does not apply to such goods that were not unloaded and were exported back. The refund claim of customs duty paid on the quantity of goods not unloaded needs to be examined afresh without considering unjust enrichment. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
