Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the impugned order rejecting the petitioners' appeal due to an alleged shortfall in pre-deposit u/s 107(6) of the CGST Act. Despite the availability of an alternative remedy, the HC entertained the petition citing failure of natural justice and non-functionality of the GST Tribunal. Following precedent, the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for de novo consideration. The petitioners were granted time to remedy any deficiencies in pre-deposit, with the respondents directed to inform them of persisting deficiencies for further rectification.
The HC set aside the impugned order rejecting the petitioners' appeal due to an alleged shortfall in pre-deposit u/s 107(6) of the CGST Act. Despite the availability of an alternative remedy, the HC entertained the petition citing failure of natural justice and non-functionality of the GST Tribunal. Following precedent, the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for de novo consideration. The petitioners were granted time to remedy any deficiencies in pre-deposit, with the respondents directed to inform them of persisting deficiencies for further rectification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
