TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Bombay HC Reinstates Appeal Dismissed for Insufficient Pre-Deposit Under CGST Act, Citing Breach of Natural Justice.</h1> <h3>D.N. Polymers Versus Union of India & Ors.</h3> The HC of Bombay set aside the Commissioner's order dismissing the petitioner's appeal for insufficient pre-deposit under the CGST Act, citing a breach of ... Maintainability of petition - availability of alternative remedy - Rejection of petitioners’ appeal on the ground of alleged shortfall of Rupees Two Lakhs in the pre-deposit required under Section 107 (6) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act - HELD THAT:- Though the petitioner has an alternate remedy in this matter, it is proposed to entertain it because it is satisfied that this is a case of failure of natural justice. Besides, petitioner pointed out that the GST Tribunal is not functional, and therefore, the petitioner does not currently have an efficacious remedy. In somewhat similar circumstances, the impugned order is interfered with, which was the subject matter of challenge in Delphi World Money Ltd. Vs. The Union of India and ors [2024 (11) TMI 781 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] where the matter was remanded to Respondent No. 2 for de novo consideration. The impugned order in appeal dated 31 July 2024 set aside and the petitioners’ appeal restored before the Commissioner (Appeals). If the pre-deposit has any deficiencies, the petitioner is granted two weeks to remedy them. If, according to the Respondents, the deficiencies still persist, the respondents must inform the petitioner within two weeks, and the petitioner must remedy them within two weeks of being so informed. The High Court of Bombay set aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) rejecting the petitioner's appeal due to a shortfall in pre-deposit under the CGST Act. The court found a breach of natural justice and restored the appeal, granting the petitioner two weeks to remedy any deficiencies in the pre-deposit. All parties' contentions on merits are left open, and the appeal must be expedited once the pre-deposit issue is resolved. The Rule was made absolute without costs, and any interim orders were vacated.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
