Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The ITAT allowed the assessee's grounds regarding TP adjustment for interest on outstanding receivables from AEs and deduction u/s 35DD. It held that no separate interest on receivables is required to be imputed as the assessee is a debt-free company and working capital adjustment was granted, relying on the decisions in Boeing India and Kusum Health Care. On deduction u/s 35DD, it directed the AO to allow 1/5th of amalgamation expenditure based on the Supreme Court's decision in Goetze India. The ITAT also held that interest u/s 234B is consequential, and u/s 234C should be charged only on returned income, not assessed income.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's grounds regarding TP adjustment for interest on outstanding receivables from AEs and deduction u/s 35DD. It held that no separate interest on receivables is required to be imputed as the assessee is a debt-free company and working capital adjustment was granted, relying on the decisions in Boeing India and Kusum Health Care. On deduction u/s 35DD, it directed the AO to allow 1/5th of amalgamation expenditure based on the Supreme Court's decision in Goetze India. The ITAT also held that interest u/s 234B is consequential, and u/s 234C should be charged only on returned income, not assessed income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
