<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee wins on TP adjustment for interest on AE receivables, amalgamation expenditure; Interest relief under 234B, 234C.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84163</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s grounds regarding TP adjustment for interest on outstanding receivables from AEs and deduction u/s 35DD. It held that no separate interest on receivables is required to be imputed as the assessee is a debt-free company and working capital adjustment was granted, relying on the decisions in Boeing India and Kusum Health Care. On deduction u/s 35DD, it directed the AO to allow 1/5th of amalgamation expenditure based on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Goetze India. The ITAT also held that interest u/s 234B is consequential, and u/s 234C should be charged only on returned income, not assessed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 08:46:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 08:46:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee wins on TP adjustment for interest on AE receivables, amalgamation expenditure; Interest relief under 234B, 234C.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84163</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s grounds regarding TP adjustment for interest on outstanding receivables from AEs and deduction u/s 35DD. It held that no separate interest on receivables is required to be imputed as the assessee is a debt-free company and working capital adjustment was granted, relying on the decisions in Boeing India and Kusum Health Care. On deduction u/s 35DD, it directed the AO to allow 1/5th of amalgamation expenditure based on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Goetze India. The ITAT also held that interest u/s 234B is consequential, and u/s 234C should be charged only on returned income, not assessed income.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 08:46:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>