Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the assessee's grounds regarding TP adjustment for interest on outstanding receivables from AEs and deduction u/s 35DD. It held that no separate interest on receivables is required to be imputed as the assessee is a debt-free company and working capital adjustment was granted, relying on the decisions in Boeing India and Kusum Health Care. On deduction u/s 35DD, it directed the AO to allow 1/5th of amalgamation expenditure based on the Supreme Court's decision in Goetze India. The ITAT also held that interest u/s 234B is consequential, and u/s 234C should be charged only on returned income, not assessed income.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's grounds regarding TP adjustment for interest on outstanding receivables from AEs and deduction u/s 35DD. It held that no separate interest on receivables is required to be imputed as the assessee is a debt-free company and working capital adjustment was granted, relying on the decisions in Boeing India and Kusum Health Care. On deduction u/s 35DD, it directed the AO to allow 1/5th of amalgamation expenditure based on the Supreme Court's decision in Goetze India. The ITAT also held that interest u/s 234B is consequential, and u/s 234C should be charged only on returned income, not assessed income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
