Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT allowed the assessee's grounds regarding TP adjustment for interest on outstanding receivables from AEs and deduction u/s 35DD. It held that no separate interest on receivables is required to be imputed as the assessee is a debt-free company and working capital adjustment was granted, relying on the decisions in Boeing India and Kusum Health Care. On deduction u/s 35DD, it directed the AO to allow 1/5th of amalgamation expenditure based on the Supreme Court's decision in Goetze India. The ITAT also held that interest u/s 234B is consequential, and u/s 234C should be charged only on returned income, not assessed income.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's grounds regarding TP adjustment for interest on outstanding receivables from AEs and deduction u/s 35DD. It held that no separate interest on receivables is required to be imputed as the assessee is a debt-free company and working capital adjustment was granted, relying on the decisions in Boeing India and Kusum Health Care. On deduction u/s 35DD, it directed the AO to allow 1/5th of amalgamation expenditure based on the Supreme Court's decision in Goetze India. The ITAT also held that interest u/s 234B is consequential, and u/s 234C should be charged only on returned income, not assessed income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
