Charitable institution cannot lose exemption merely because some activities incidentally benefit a religious community; retrospective registration can...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2661 to 2680 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the rejection of the Appellant's claim by the Resolution Professional (RP) due to delay. The Committee of Creditors (CoC) had approved the resolution plan on 18.10.2021, while the Appellant filed the claim on 19.03.2022, much after the approval. The Tribunal followed the Supreme Court's judgment in M/s RPS Infra, which held that once the CoC approves the plan, no claim can be entertained, even if the Adjudicating Authority has not yet approved the plan. The Appellant's reliance on the Puneet Kaur case was rendered ineffective by the subsequent M/s RPS Infra judgment. Consequently, the Appellate Tribunal found no error in rejecting the Appellant's belated claim after the CoC's approval of the resolution plan.
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the rejection of the Appellant's claim by the Resolution Professional (RP) due to delay. The Committee of Creditors (CoC) had approved the resolution plan on 18.10.2021, while the Appellant filed the claim on 19.03.2022, much after the approval. The Tribunal followed the Supreme Court's judgment in M/s RPS Infra, which held that once the CoC approves the plan, no claim can be entertained, even if the Adjudicating Authority has not yet approved the plan. The Appellant's reliance on the Puneet Kaur case was rendered ineffective by the subsequent M/s RPS Infra judgment. Consequently, the Appellate Tribunal found no error in rejecting the Appellant's belated claim after the CoC's approval of the resolution plan.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
