Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a claim filed after public announcement, and after approval of the resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors, could be admitted or the rejection of such delayed claim was liable to be set aside.
Analysis: The claim was filed long after the last date fixed pursuant to the public announcement and after the Committee of Creditors had already approved the resolution plan. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code contemplates a time-bound resolution process, and public announcement under the Code and the Regulations constitutes deemed knowledge of the corporate insolvency resolution process. Once the resolution plan has been approved by the Committee of Creditors, entertaining a fresh claim at a belated stage would unsettle the process and reopen settled issues. The Tribunal therefore committed no error in refusing to admit the delayed claim.
Conclusion: The rejection of the appellant's claim as delayed was upheld, and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A claim not filed within the prescribed CIRP timeline and sought to be introduced after approval of the resolution plan cannot ordinarily be entertained, as the insolvency framework is time-bound and public announcement gives deemed knowledge of the process.