Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Appellant Association, M/s. Lanco Infratech Employees Welfare Association, comprising 212 members, seeking entitlement to 'retention allowance'. The Tribunal held that the members were not entitled to the retention allowance amounting to Rs. 2,80,36,076/- as no service conditions or terms of appointment were provided to establish that the retention allowance formed part of their emoluments or salary payable under the service contract. The endorsement by the then Managing Director and payment slips alone were insufficient to establish the legal enforceability of the retention allowance. However, the Tribunal upheld the entitlement to salary for the month of June 2017, subject to it not being already paid or challenged before a superior forum. The Impugned Order dated 11.03.2024 by the NCLT was found free from apparent error, and the appeal was dismissed.
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Appellant Association, M/s. Lanco Infratech Employees Welfare Association, comprising 212 members, seeking entitlement to 'retention allowance'. The Tribunal held that the members were not entitled to the retention allowance amounting to Rs. 2,80,36,076/- as no service conditions or terms of appointment were provided to establish that the retention allowance formed part of their emoluments or salary payable under the service contract. The endorsement by the then Managing Director and payment slips alone were insufficient to establish the legal enforceability of the retention allowance. However, the Tribunal upheld the entitlement to salary for the month of June 2017, subject to it not being already paid or challenged before a superior forum. The Impugned Order dated 11.03.2024 by the NCLT was found free from apparent error, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
