Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Section 179 director liability requires foundational facts and a reasonable opportunity before corporate veil can be lifted.
    Change of opinion bars reassessment where a deduction claim was already scrutinised and accepted on the same material.
    Deemed reassessment notices and surviving limitation period rendered later notices invalid for want of jurisdiction
    Independent reassessment under section 148A fails when vague investigation inputs are not disclosed or verified.
    Section 50C cannot control section 54F net consideration; full capital gains exemption followed on actual reinvestment
    Strict construction of pension policy exemption kept premature surrender proceeds taxable under the charging provisions.
    Adequate enquiry defeats revision, and amalgamation bar did not block the additional employee cost deduction
    Refundable student caution money is not taxable as cessation of liability; excessive related-party interest disallowance sustained
    Medical relief as charitable purpose survives hospital surplus and premium facilities; cancellation for alleged scheme breach was unsustainable.
    Consistency in testamentary trust taxation led to application of the individual rate after prior departmental acceptance of the same trust.
    Corporate guarantee as an international transaction requires transfer pricing benchmarking, with commission based on average exposure.
    Satisfaction note recorded after the cut-off date made search assessments without jurisdiction and void
    Corporate guarantee pricing at 1% upheld, while bad debt write-off and finance lease rentals were allowed as deductions.
    Retracted confessions and uncorroborated co-noticee statements cannot sustain penalty without mandatory procedural compliance in adjudication.
    Tariff classification of automotive cables and driver monitoring assemblies turns on specific headings and signalling function.
    SFIO prosecutions need no pre-cognizance hearing; special Companies Act procedure overrides general BNSS complaint rules.
    Depository supervisory negligence supports investor indemnification, while Section 37 prevents reappreciation of a plausible award.
    Directory adjudication deadline under service tax law cannot be invoked by an assessee who caused the delay.
    Exemption for examination-related services rejected where recipients were commercial entities; suppression sustained extended limitation and penalties...
    Interest on delayed refund awarded from payment date after illegal tax retention without show cause notice.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      The High Court dismissed the application filed by the plaintiffs...

      Plaintiffs' request for securing amount rejected; failed to prove defendants' intent to dispose assets.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      GSTDecember 16, 2024Case LawsHC
      The High Court dismissed the application filed by the plaintiffs seeking an order to require the defendants to secure an amount of Rs. 1,14,88,833/- until the disposal of the suit. The Court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case against the defendants to demonstrate that they were attempting to dispose of or remove movable or immovable properties from the Court's jurisdiction to prevent the plaintiffs from realizing any decretal amount that may be awarded in the future. The Court found that the plaintiffs merely made a bald statement about apprehending the defendants' potential actions, without providing any supporting documents. The dispute over the principal amount of Rs. 77,05,223/- claimed by the plaintiffs, along with interest at 18% per annum, and the defendants' defense of having returned goods worth Rs. 55,24,252/- to the plaintiff company, remains a matter for trial.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax