<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Plaintiffs&#039; request for securing amount rejected; failed to prove defendants&#039; intent to dispose assets.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84036</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the application filed by the plaintiffs seeking an order to require the defendants to secure an amount of Rs. 1,14,88,833/- until the disposal of the suit. The Court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case against the defendants to demonstrate that they were attempting to dispose of or remove movable or immovable properties from the Court&#039;s jurisdiction to prevent the plaintiffs from realizing any decretal amount that may be awarded in the future. The Court found that the plaintiffs merely made a bald statement about apprehending the defendants&#039; potential actions, without providing any supporting documents. The dispute over the principal amount of Rs. 77,05,223/- claimed by the plaintiffs, al.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 08:44:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 08:44:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Plaintiffs&#039; request for securing amount rejected; failed to prove defendants&#039; intent to dispose assets.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84036</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the application filed by the plaintiffs seeking an order to require the defendants to secure an amount of Rs. 1,14,88,833/- until the disposal of the suit. The Court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case against the defendants to demonstrate that they were attempting to dispose of or remove movable or immovable properties from the Court&#039;s jurisdiction to prevent the plaintiffs from realizing any decretal amount that may be awarded in the future. The Court found that the plaintiffs merely made a bald statement about apprehending the defendants&#039; potential actions, without providing any supporting documents. The dispute over the principal amount of Rs. 77,05,223/- claimed by the plaintiffs, al.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 08:44:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>