Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The High Court quashed the impugned notice u/s 148 for reopening of assessment. It held that since the petitioner had not directly received any remittances from the DSNE CGHS, there was no occasion for the petitioner to make a disclosure in its Return of Income. Consequently, the reason to believe for invoking Section 147 for reassessment was unsustainable. However, the Court left it open to the respondents to initiate proceedings afresh, if otherwise permissible in law.
The High Court quashed the impugned notice u/s 148 for reopening of assessment. It held that since the petitioner had not directly received any remittances from the DSNE CGHS, there was no occasion for the petitioner to make a disclosure in its Return of Income. Consequently, the reason to believe for invoking Section 147 for reassessment was unsustainable. However, the Court left it open to the respondents to initiate proceedings afresh, if otherwise permissible in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
