Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
The High Court quashed the impugned notice u/s 148 for reopening of assessment. It held that since the petitioner had not directly received any remittances from the DSNE CGHS, there was no occasion for the petitioner to make a disclosure in its Return of Income. Consequently, the reason to believe for invoking Section 147 for reassessment was unsustainable. However, the Court left it open to the respondents to initiate proceedings afresh, if otherwise permissible in law.
The High Court quashed the impugned notice u/s 148 for reopening of assessment. It held that since the petitioner had not directly received any remittances from the DSNE CGHS, there was no occasion for the petitioner to make a disclosure in its Return of Income. Consequently, the reason to believe for invoking Section 147 for reassessment was unsustainable. However, the Court left it open to the respondents to initiate proceedings afresh, if otherwise permissible in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
