Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court quashed the impugned notice u/s 148 for reopening of assessment. It held that since the petitioner had not directly received any remittances from the DSNE CGHS, there was no occasion for the petitioner to make a disclosure in its Return of Income. Consequently, the reason to believe for invoking Section 147 for reassessment was unsustainable. However, the Court left it open to the respondents to initiate proceedings afresh, if otherwise permissible in law.
The High Court quashed the impugned notice u/s 148 for reopening of assessment. It held that since the petitioner had not directly received any remittances from the DSNE CGHS, there was no occasion for the petitioner to make a disclosure in its Return of Income. Consequently, the reason to believe for invoking Section 147 for reassessment was unsustainable. However, the Court left it open to the respondents to initiate proceedings afresh, if otherwise permissible in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
