Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court granted bail to the applicant Padam Singhee in a money laundering case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The applicant was accused of siphoning off loans by indulging in criminal conspiracy and generating proceeds of crime. Although the applicant had been granted bail in the predicate offence, no charge sheet had been submitted in that case regarding the present issue related to Punjab National Bank. The court held that the PMLA case and the predicate offence must be tried together by the same court, which was not possible at present since the predicate offence was yet to see its charge sheet. Adhering to the principle of "bail is the rule, and jail is an exception," the court granted bail to the applicant, who had been in custody since February 7, 2024, subject to furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the concerned court and fulfilling conditions imposed in the interest of justice.
The High Court granted bail to the applicant Padam Singhee in a money laundering case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The applicant was accused of siphoning off loans by indulging in criminal conspiracy and generating proceeds of crime. Although the applicant had been granted bail in the predicate offence, no charge sheet had been submitted in that case regarding the present issue related to Punjab National Bank. The court held that the PMLA case and the predicate offence must be tried together by the same court, which was not possible at present since the predicate offence was yet to see its charge sheet. Adhering to the principle of "bail is the rule, and jail is an exception," the court granted bail to the applicant, who had been in custody since February 7, 2024, subject to furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the concerned court and fulfilling conditions imposed in the interest of justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
