Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
The CESTAT disposed of the appeal with the following key holdings: Undervaluation relating to stock transfer to their own unit and sale to sister unit was held not sustainable as it was a revenue-neutral situation. Demand of Rs.1,94,02,717/- and Rs.52,28,055/- set aside. Demand of Rs.1,15,616/- for short receipt of methanol set aside following the tribunal's earlier ruling allowing transit loss. CENVAT credit of Rs.2,50,647/- for inputs used in research and development allowed as it relates to manufacturing activity. CENVAT credit of Rs.14,86,640/- and Rs.34,88,013/- taken on endorsed invoices/bills of entry allowed following the Allahabad High Court's ruling. Demand of Rs.14,04,491/- for alleged shortage of finished goods set aside due to lack of evidence on clearances, transportation, and recipients. Consequently, no penalty was imposable on the appellant.
The CESTAT disposed of the appeal with the following key holdings: Undervaluation relating to stock transfer to their own unit and sale to sister unit was held not sustainable as it was a revenue-neutral situation. Demand of Rs.1,94,02,717/- and Rs.52,28,055/- set aside. Demand of Rs.1,15,616/- for short receipt of methanol set aside following the tribunal's earlier ruling allowing transit loss. CENVAT credit of Rs.2,50,647/- for inputs used in research and development allowed as it relates to manufacturing activity. CENVAT credit of Rs.14,86,640/- and Rs.34,88,013/- taken on endorsed invoices/bills of entry allowed following the Allahabad High Court's ruling. Demand of Rs.14,04,491/- for alleged shortage of finished goods set aside due to lack of evidence on clearances, transportation, and recipients. Consequently, no penalty was imposable on the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
