Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The CESTAT disposed of the appeal with the following key holdings: Undervaluation relating to stock transfer to their own unit and sale to sister unit was held not sustainable as it was a revenue-neutral situation. Demand of Rs.1,94,02,717/- and Rs.52,28,055/- set aside. Demand of Rs.1,15,616/- for short receipt of methanol set aside following the tribunal's earlier ruling allowing transit loss. CENVAT credit of Rs.2,50,647/- for inputs used in research and development allowed as it relates to manufacturing activity. CENVAT credit of Rs.14,86,640/- and Rs.34,88,013/- taken on endorsed invoices/bills of entry allowed following the Allahabad High Court's ruling. Demand of Rs.14,04,491/- for alleged shortage of finished goods set aside due to lack of evidence on clearances, transportation, and recipients. Consequently, no penalty was imposable on the appellant.
The CESTAT disposed of the appeal with the following key holdings: Undervaluation relating to stock transfer to their own unit and sale to sister unit was held not sustainable as it was a revenue-neutral situation. Demand of Rs.1,94,02,717/- and Rs.52,28,055/- set aside. Demand of Rs.1,15,616/- for short receipt of methanol set aside following the tribunal's earlier ruling allowing transit loss. CENVAT credit of Rs.2,50,647/- for inputs used in research and development allowed as it relates to manufacturing activity. CENVAT credit of Rs.14,86,640/- and Rs.34,88,013/- taken on endorsed invoices/bills of entry allowed following the Allahabad High Court's ruling. Demand of Rs.14,04,491/- for alleged shortage of finished goods set aside due to lack of evidence on clearances, transportation, and recipients. Consequently, no penalty was imposable on the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
