Electricity network contributions remain revenue expenditure where ownership and maintenance stay with the electricity board, supporting business prof...
Commission expenditure linked to pharmaceutical marketing income qualifies as business deduction when recipient identity, genuineness and business pur...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The CESTAT disposed of the appeal with the following key holdings: Undervaluation relating to stock transfer to their own unit and sale to sister unit was held not sustainable as it was a revenue-neutral situation. Demand of Rs.1,94,02,717/- and Rs.52,28,055/- set aside. Demand of Rs.1,15,616/- for short receipt of methanol set aside following the tribunal's earlier ruling allowing transit loss. CENVAT credit of Rs.2,50,647/- for inputs used in research and development allowed as it relates to manufacturing activity. CENVAT credit of Rs.14,86,640/- and Rs.34,88,013/- taken on endorsed invoices/bills of entry allowed following the Allahabad High Court's ruling. Demand of Rs.14,04,491/- for alleged shortage of finished goods set aside due to lack of evidence on clearances, transportation, and recipients. Consequently, no penalty was imposable on the appellant.
The CESTAT disposed of the appeal with the following key holdings: Undervaluation relating to stock transfer to their own unit and sale to sister unit was held not sustainable as it was a revenue-neutral situation. Demand of Rs.1,94,02,717/- and Rs.52,28,055/- set aside. Demand of Rs.1,15,616/- for short receipt of methanol set aside following the tribunal's earlier ruling allowing transit loss. CENVAT credit of Rs.2,50,647/- for inputs used in research and development allowed as it relates to manufacturing activity. CENVAT credit of Rs.14,86,640/- and Rs.34,88,013/- taken on endorsed invoices/bills of entry allowed following the Allahabad High Court's ruling. Demand of Rs.14,04,491/- for alleged shortage of finished goods set aside due to lack of evidence on clearances, transportation, and recipients. Consequently, no penalty was imposable on the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
