Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The High Court allowed the writ petition. Without altering the classification in the shipping bills filed u/s 50, the duty drawback sanctioned to the petitioner cannot be denied by invoking Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. As per the Supreme Court's rulings in Priya Blue Industries Ltd. and ITC Limited cases, while processing a refund application, reassessment is not permitted, nor can conditions of exemption be adjudicated. Reassessment is permitted only u/ss 17(3), (4), and (5). When the law mandates a particular thing to be done in a particular manner, it has to be done in that manner. Thus, there is no legal basis to sustain the impugned order denying the higher rate of duty drawback claimed by the petitioner.
The High Court allowed the writ petition. Without altering the classification in the shipping bills filed u/s 50, the duty drawback sanctioned to the petitioner cannot be denied by invoking Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. As per the Supreme Court's rulings in Priya Blue Industries Ltd. and ITC Limited cases, while processing a refund application, reassessment is not permitted, nor can conditions of exemption be adjudicated. Reassessment is permitted only u/ss 17(3), (4), and (5). When the law mandates a particular thing to be done in a particular manner, it has to be done in that manner. Thus, there is no legal basis to sustain the impugned order denying the higher rate of duty drawback claimed by the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.