Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court held that the acquisition of the trademark 'FABINDIA' during the financial year 2006-07 could not be treated as an international transaction within the meaning of Section 92B of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2011-12. The transaction to purchase an asset is a singular transaction, and if it is an international transaction, the arm's length price determination is required in the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which the transaction was entered into. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's direction to the Assessing Officer was to examine the admissibility and quantum of depreciation allowable on the trademark, not to make a reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer. Since no international transaction was entered into in the relevant year, the reference made by the Assessing Officer to the Transfer Pricing Officer was without jurisdiction, and the impugned order was set aside by the High Court.
The High Court held that the acquisition of the trademark 'FABINDIA' during the financial year 2006-07 could not be treated as an international transaction within the meaning of Section 92B of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2011-12. The transaction to purchase an asset is a singular transaction, and if it is an international transaction, the arm's length price determination is required in the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which the transaction was entered into. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's direction to the Assessing Officer was to examine the admissibility and quantum of depreciation allowable on the trademark, not to make a reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer. Since no international transaction was entered into in the relevant year, the reference made by the Assessing Officer to the Transfer Pricing Officer was without jurisdiction, and the impugned order was set aside by the High Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.