<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Trademark Acquisition Not International Transaction; High Court Rules Against Transfer Pricing Officer Involvement.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83736</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the acquisition of the trademark &#039;FABINDIA&#039; during the financial year 2006-07 could not be treated as an international transaction within the meaning of Section 92B of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2011-12. The transaction to purchase an asset is a singular transaction, and if it is an international transaction, the arm&#039;s length price determination is required in the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which the transaction was entered into. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s direction to the Assessing Officer was to examine the admissibility and quantum of depreciation allowable on the trademark, not to make a reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer. Since no international transaction w.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 08:47:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 08:47:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Trademark Acquisition Not International Transaction; High Court Rules Against Transfer Pricing Officer Involvement.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83736</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the acquisition of the trademark &#039;FABINDIA&#039; during the financial year 2006-07 could not be treated as an international transaction within the meaning of Section 92B of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2011-12. The transaction to purchase an asset is a singular transaction, and if it is an international transaction, the arm&#039;s length price determination is required in the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which the transaction was entered into. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s direction to the Assessing Officer was to examine the admissibility and quantum of depreciation allowable on the trademark, not to make a reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer. Since no international transaction w.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 08:47:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>